Відео

The Inflation Rate is the Fed Funds Rate.

The answer is always: be globally diversified. People advocating for VOO only just make me shake my head.

If you enjoyed this interview with Jason, you might also like our Show Us Your Portfolio interview with him where we discussed how he manages his personal portfolio. You can find it here ua-cam.com/video/mtAMInVYBtU/v-deo.html

I mean, Powell confirmed the Sept cut. What else you want

This is one of the best interviews chock full of information that would take years to learn.

Dude, I lost 70k while listening to this episode!! 😒

At 45:00-46:00 min, when you went into the professional, perpetual, doom and gloom "mongers" who are ALWAYS amongst us..JEREMY GRANTHAM'S and PETER SCHIFF'S faces, simultaneously popped into my mind! I've met HOSPICE PATIENTS, with a sunnier outlook on life, than those two characters!! They're living examples of the old adage.."Even a broken clock is right, twice a day". LOL!!

For many decades, the S&P500 has been touted as the premier way to build wealth through an equity portfolio, and has been the index that has been hardest "to beat". This has been because of the "market capitalization weighting effect" ( could be considered a returns "factor" ? ). Building an equal weighted portfolio using the size & value factors (small & large value), via low cost ETFs, combined with a stripped down version of the S&P500 ( the QQQ / Nasdaq 100 trust ETF ) creates a portfolio that has handily beaten the S&P500 over ten rolling 30 year periods since 1986 - this performance with equivalent downside volatility. The small & large value allocations have provided a downside volatility offset to that of the Nasdaq 100 during "downsides" ( during 2000-2002 & 2022 decline periods for example ), while the "capitalization weighting effect" embedded in the QQQ has produced the "alpha" for the portfolio on the "upsides". And the portfolio holds 400+ of the same companies as the S&P500 ( those being shared within the portfolios of the Vanguard "Value" ETF (VTV) and QQQ ). Therefore, you get a "redesigned" S&P500 with 1) a market cap weighting tilt 2) a size and value factor tilt and 3) a "quality" factor tilt ( a number of companies in the "iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF" being shared with VTV and QQQ ).

Good stuff

Subset: Band Superheavy

Great episode! You guys are right, UA-cam commenters are the worst!! 😂🤣… hey, wait a minute… 🤔… this is feeling very meta… 😉 keep up the good work! 👍 I just follow the KISS method for investing: Keep It Stupid, Simple!

Warren Buffet is to Sir Mix-A-Lot as I like a good cigar butt is to I like big butts and I cannot lie… that’s College Board certified 👍yes, I feel at home here. Excess Returns 🚀 🌖

Thank you for a great video. financial education is what the world needs most right now. I studied and researched about crypto and stocks for a while and got stuck on the learning curve. Thanks to Loraine Souvenir program, i've grasped trading concepts, boosting my earnings through her daily signals and insights.

I’ve been making a lot of losses trying to make profit trading. I thought trading on a demo account is just like trading the real market. Can anyone help me out or at least advise me on what to do?

Summary - Diversity and you're probably stupider than you think you are

Context is necessary. Andy has been short the market for a while and he's losing money. Reason why he's calling Prof Jeremy in such bad language. What a shame.

I lost over $80k when everything started to tank. Not because I was in an exchange that went belly up. I was just stupid to hold and because that's what everyone said. I'm still responsible. It just taught me to be a better investor now that I understand more of what could go wrong. It took me over two years of being in the market, I'm really grateful I found one source to recover my money, at least $10k profits weekly. Thanks Belinda Owens .

After listening to this cacophony of "advice," I am evermore convinced that simple indexing is the correct path for 90% of all investors.

I like Dan Villalon's take on diversification. Peter Lynch had taken positions in both Enron and Worldcom but it didn't blow up his portfolio because he was diversified. He also wasn't ignorant of how to look at fundamentals. If Enron and Worldcom had been two of a concentrated Buffett-style eight portfolio stock, he likely wouldn't have the track record he had.

Great video.

Brilliant idea, great topic. Thanks for sharing.

So is this interview from Monday the 12th or later?

Excellent!

Wonderful

Great episode! The best advice confirmed my biases! The worst advice caused heart palpitations, sweating, headaches, dizziness, and blurred vision… you know, I don’t think I heard much of what the bad advice givers had to say… Can I get more of Simeon Hyman poking fun at the doom and gloom Chicago Boys? I can’t get enough of that!! Those doomers from Chicago ruining the world 😂🤣😂

pick and mix

Thank you for watching this video! If you enjoyed it, you might also like our conversation with Andy where he explained how he manages his personal portfolio. You can find it here ua-cam.com/video/4e9k7nnmrAA/v-deo.html

Thank you for watching this video! If you enjoyed it, you might also like our conversation with Meb where he explained how he manages his personal portfolio. You can find it here ua-cam.com/video/oY_PwABNJ7M/v-deo.html

Thank you for watching this video! If you enjoyed it, you might also enjoy our episode where we broke down the biggest lessons we learned from this conversation. You can find it here. ua-cam.com/video/DOTwQ5k8lcQ/v-deo.html

always reminded of the story of the story of the husband & wife who went to a CFA in 1990. They both invested 50k. She retained the CFA to manage the pitfalls of investing. The husband died in 2020. Her portfolio was worth 480k. Husband still had the same 1990 portfolio. It was now worth $1.42m. 250% better return by not trying to time downturns, interest rate changes or pivot to momentum stocks.

50% stock allocation is not very convincing and very risky as I prefer to least 25% stock allocation, which would be safer and sustainable if you would like to achieve the consistent positive return to have decent sharpe ratio with optimal beta below 0.06. and it would be extremely dangerous to have 50% exposure to stocks as only a few stocks have low correlations to S&P500.

You can skip the first part of this video to get to the lessons learned starting at 1:04 and the last 11 minutes.

Technical analysis, sharp insights, and solid strategies are crucial for success in trading. Understanding market trends and making informed decisions can make all the difference. A big shoutout to Loraine Souvenir for her exceptional guidance and support in mastering these essential skills! so glad I started her program.

Big fan of Toby keep bringing him back to hold the record

Thank you ! Listening this by the lake after an amazing week in the market. When i look at Yen futures, the contracts of large traders are no longer shorts. But now, i see the yen is starting to weaken again, so it's risk on again.

I leant that Dividend paying companies are typically not going to grow in stock price as much and the overall market. But they do tend to be stable mature companies. I want to invest around 600K for retirement, is this good strategy?

“Passive flows don’t affect valuation, I just don’t believe it” -> jeeez what universe does this guy live in?? He says there’s no evidence of it. Has he ever listened to Mike Green and all the work he’s done on it? The fact that passive flows may continue and therefore a passive indexing strategy may still be superior for the coming years/decade, doesn’t mean that passive flows don’t impact overall valuations. He just wants to believe the market is priced by active value investors and that passive participants are just in for the ride… It’s ok to believe that passive flows bid up the stock market and that THEREFORE a passive index strategy may the the smartest thing to do. He’s just intellectually lazy on that point.

T sum it all up, this is yet another way that the market makers use to screw the amateurs out of their life savings. Nothing to see here, move along. 😂

Great interview!

I'll stay put in domestic equities. After all of the low volume summer doldrum market hullaballo, the S&P550 now back positive for August .

Why does Andy believe that the Fed does not control its own Fed Funds Rate?

Andy is definitely the GOAT!

Andy is very measured.

Andy is the GOAT 🔥

Vix futures went up to 43something, not 35 to be precise.

I lost over $80k when everything started to tank. Not because I was in an exchange that went belly up. I was just stupid to hold and because that's what everyone said. I'm still responsible. It just taught me to be a better trader now that I understand more of what could go wrong. It took me over two years of being in the market, I'm really grateful I found one source to recover my money, at least $10k profits weekly. Thanks Kerrie Farrell.

This is a fantastic interview thanks, really helpful

I lost over $70k when everything started to tank. Not because I was in an exchange that went belly up. I was just stupid to hold and because that's what everyone said. I'm still responsible. It just taught me to be a better investor now that I understand more of what could go wrong. It took me over two years of being in the market, I'm really grateful I found one source to recover my money, at least $10k profits weekly. Thanks Natalie Strayer.

When i saw how many views this video has after 2 years it confirms for me once again, that i have an edge, such a legend sharing information and all the upcoming new or old traders dont have the attention capability to listen to this.

love the OPEX talk with Brent Is there a site where calls vs puts percentages are available. eg, amzn 50 %calls, 40% puts?